Sac.org Needs Your Data.

The City of Sacto is looking for YOUR input on how to revamp their website. And, in case you haven’t been there in a while, it needs it. Here’s what to do:

Go to the city’s website, or get there fast.
Click on the link at the top/middle of the page, or get there fast.

I think it’s terrific that Sacto is looking for input on this matter — California cities’ web sites are all over the map (er, web) in terms of design, content, and layout. In fact, looking to even a few other cities’ sites might lend guidance on how to reshape our city’s online image. For example:

Davis. Front loads on the links, but very simple to read and navigate.
Camarillo. Pretty blue color. Images of C-rillo’s most notable architecture. Quick links. Probably good for a city, like this one, that doesn’t have a lot going on most of the time. Probably not a good template for a city like Sacto.
Los Angeles. The town is made of money, and their web site proves it (complete with pop-up ad!). This site has color, loads of quick links, highlights, features . . . this could be the mecca of all city web sites.

P.S. How ’bout a final word on whether city web sites should follow a uniform URL pattern: Davis and Los Angeles (who rarely have anything in common) both opted for the .org identity; good ol’ conservative Camarillo went for the more professional ci.cityname.ca.gov approach.

Which is your preference, and do you think all cities should follow the same format?

Comments are closed.


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.