Everyone’s A Critic

Or just critical. Or maybe that’s just me.

Props to Ursula for catching the MSN list of top Sac restaurants. Ursula is far more diplomatic than I am. I can’t help but wonder, looking at the picks, if there wasn’t a fee involved in making the list.

The list, by the way, in tiny print, is credited to Gayot.com a site that supposedly “serves as a serious, honest and professional resource on dining and travel for an international readership in search of the best.” I called a qualified bullsh*t because the list includes Dragonfly - Sacramento’s home of overpriced, poor quality sushi, and McCormick & Schmick’s which, while tasty, is not a restaurant-reason to come to Sacramento because most people can find it at home.

The true gems of Sacramento dining - places like Mulvaney’s, Moxie, and The Kitchen, are suspiciously absent.

6 Comments so far

  1. Alvin (unregistered) on January 11th, 2008 @ 1:48 pm

    How about the you guys (and maybe visitors to the site) come up with your own list of top 10 restaurants in Sac. I mean why leave it to reviewers that have only visited the city a few times. I keep finding new and interesting places and I have lived here for years. You mention “Mulvaney’s, Moxie, and The Kitchen” but I have never heard of these places. Every few months, there are new places that open up. It’s a bit of a food renaissance if you think about it.

    So how about it? Metroblogging Sacramento’s list of top 10?

  2. Ursula (unregistered) on January 11th, 2008 @ 2:50 pm

    Hmmm, since I don’t eat typically sushi, I liked Dragonfly–I had the teriyaki chicken.

    I’m afraid a top 10 list by a non-sophisticated diner like myself might include such faves as In-n-Out burger. Yes, really. Chain chain chains. But I think the idea has merit. Certainly other writers on this site have the sophistication and…uh, moxie? to give it a try!

  3. Ursula (unregistered) on January 11th, 2008 @ 2:51 pm

    That would be “typically eat”…note word order correction. :-)

  4. Jay Charles (unregistered) on January 11th, 2008 @ 9:03 pm

    christiana - I wish that I’d considered a “pay-for-inclusion” angle with regards to that msn list…makes sense to me! And that I’d remembered Moxie and Mulvaney’s as well as The Kitchen when I left a comment on ursula’s post earlier.

    alvin - wow. what a great idea!

    ursula - what about more than one list? perhaps based on level of sophistication? Don’t ask me how such a level would be determined…price? percentage of menu not in English? Number of sous-chefs in the kitchen? executive decision by an appointed Arbiter of Sophisitcation?

  5. Mad Dog (unregistered) on January 14th, 2008 @ 8:41 am

    I prefer a local treat like Todo Un Poco in Laguna. Lots of choices, the owner actually cares, and it is unique.

  6. cd (unregistered) on January 14th, 2008 @ 9:56 am

    Good ideas all around. I’ve tossed the notion out to our intrepid, if small-in-number authors to see what kind of angle they’d like to take on this - either individual or a group list.

    So you’ll see some kind of input from us soon.

    I like the idea of multiple lists or maybe just multiple catagories. Stay tuned!


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.